Am. Home Assur. Co. v. Golomb, 239 Ill. App. 3d 37, 606 N.E.2d 793 (4th Dist. 1992)

Posted on Updated on

Am. Home Assur. Co. v. Golomb, 239 Ill. App. 3d 37, 606 N.E.2d 793 (4th Dist. 1992) (attorney denied fee for knowingly charging contingent fee in excess of statutory maximum; whether disgorgement or forfeiture of fee appropriate for breach of fiduciary duty depends on facts)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s