Brandon Apparel Grp. v. Kirkland and Ellis, 382 Ill. App. 3d 273, 887 N.E.2d 748 (1st Dist. 2008)

Posted on Updated on

Brandon Apparel Grp. v. Kirkland and Ellis, 382 Ill. App. 3d 273, 887 N.E.2d 748 (1st Dist. 2008) (malpractice actions are not assignable; question of fact whether receivership order assigned malpractice action)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s