Recent Illinois Case: Janousek v. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

Posted on Updated on

The First District affirmed the grant of summary judgment on statute of limitations grounds. The court held that the plaintiff’s suspicions that his attorney was aiding and abetting a client’s breach of fiduciary duty was sufficient knowledge to commence the statute. The court also held that the defendant attorneys did not improperly use the attorney client privilege to shield relevant information plaintiff needed to discover his claim.

Janousek v. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, 2015 IL App (1st) 142989

(This is for informational purposes and is not legal advice.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s