Recent Illinois Case: Ferris, Thompson and Zweig, Ltd. v. Esposito

Posted on Updated on

The Second District reversed the dismissal of a complaint asserting breach of a fee-splitting agreement between attorneys. The circuit court had dismissed the complaint because the agreement did not affirmatively state that both lawyers agreed to assume joint financial responsibility in representing the client.

The Second District analyzed the history of Rule of Professional Conduct 1.5(e) and concluded that the written agreement did not have to contain financial responsibility language to be enforceable.

Ferris, Thompson and Zweig, Ltd. v. Esposito, 2016 IL App (2d) 151148.

(This is for informational purposes and is not legal advice.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s