In re Estate of Zeid v Hays and Aronberg Goldgehn Davis & Garmisa
In this unpublished opinion, the First District analyzes several malpractice claims to determine whether they were properly dismissed as time barred.
For the most part, the analysis turned on whether the various claims related back to a timely filed complaint. In turn, that analysis turned on whether the various claims did or did not arise out of the same transaction as the timely complaint.
(This is for informational purposes and is not legal advice.)