Stevens v. Shari
The court held that the plaintiff failed to state a claim against a lawyer, in part, because she failed to allege the existence of an attorney client relationship. The fact that the plaintiff was represented by other counsel made it implausible that the defendant lawyer represented her. The court further held that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations. The claim accrued when the underlying bankruptcy court made its initial decision; accrual did not depend upon the result of the subsequent appeal.
Stevens v. Sharif, No. 15 C 1405, 2017 WL 449175 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 2, 2017)
(This is for informational purposes and is not legal advice.)